'Charles Dickens in Love' by Robert Garnett
View all News »
Columns Columns on ArcaMax Automotive Business Entertainment Games Health Home & Consumer Knowledge Life Advice Parents Pets Politics Recipes Religion & Spirituality Senior Living Travel & LeisureView all Columns »
Comics Popular Comics on ArcaMax BC Baby Blues Beetle Bailey Blondie Family Circus Garfield Hagar the Horrible Pickles Wizard of Id ZitsView all Comics »
Videos Videos on ArcaMax Automotive Videos Business Videos Current News Videos Entertainment Videos Essential Home Daily Video Game Videos Gardening Videos Healthy Life Daily Video History Videos Life Advice Videos Parents Videos Personal Finance Videos Pets Video Politics Video Recipe Videos Religion Videos Senior Living Videos Sports Video Tech Videos Travel Video Video Games Wine and Dine Daily Video Women VideoView all Videos »
Washington Post Book Reviews / Entertainment / ArcaMax LOGIN | REGISTER Subscribe to Washington Post Book Reviews newsletter ( Privacy Policy )
Washington Post book reviewers Kate Summerscale
Bloomsbury
ISBN 978-1608199136
303 pages
$26
Reviewed by Jonathan Yardley
In the 19th century, Kate Summerscale reports, keeping private diaries became all the rage among the educated and genteel of England: "Of all the written life stories that fascinated the Victorians - biographies, autobiographies, memoirs, journals of health and travel and politics - the personal diary was the most subjective and raw, the most revealing of the problems of writing and reading about the self." The fad "was fueled by the popularity of Romantic poetry, which prized introspection, and by the first publications of personal journals: the seventeenth-century diaries of John Evelyn originally appeared in 1818 and those of [Samuel] Pepys in 1825."
Diaries were especially popular among women, even the most privileged of whom led sharply constrained lives and were granted virtually no rights; married women lived at the mercy of their husbands, who had total control over whatever money they brought to their marriages, and single women - especially those old enough to qualify as spinsters - were similarly disenfranchised. Small wonder that many of them turned to diaries as means of self-expression and exploration of emotions and experiences about which they could not, or would not, speak to others. This was not without its risks: "The act of diary-keeping honoured many of the values of Victorian society - self-reliance, autonomy, the capacity to keep secrets. But if taken too far, these same virtues could turn to vices. Self-reliance could become a radical disconnection from society, its codes and rules and restraints; secrecy could curdle into deceit; self-monitoring into solipsism; and introspection into monomania."
For one woman, Isabella Robinson, diary-keeping turned into nothing less than a nightmare. Born in London in 1813 into a prosperous family, she was widowed in 1842 and remarried, to Henry Oliver Robinson, in 1844. She had three sons, one from her first marriage, and was deeply unhappy. In 1849 she began keeping a diary, in which she set down her complaints about her husband - "he was an 'incongenial partner' ... 'uneducated, narrow-minded, harsh-tempered, selfish, proud'" - and contemptuous of her longing "to talk about literature and politics, to write poetry, learn languages and read the latest essays on science and philosophy." As Summerscale notes, the diary was Isabella's means of escape:
"Isabella, like many nineteenth-century women, used her journal as a place in which to confess her weakness, her sadness and her sins. In its pages she audited her behaviour and her thoughts; she grappled with her errors and tried to plot out a path to virtue. Yet by channeling her strong and unruly feelings into this book, Isabella also created a record and a memory of those feelings. She found herself telling a story, a serial in daily parts, in which she was the wronged and desperate heroine."
Her diary became a record of the emotional roller-coaster ride that was her life. She "had been guilty, she said, of 'impatience under trials, wandering affections, want of self-denial and resolute persistence in well-doing; as a parent, as a daughter, as a sister, as a wife, as a pupil, as a friend, as a mistress.'" Precisely what she meant by this last is unclear - probably she meant as a "mistress" to servants - but elsewhere she made it abundantly plain that one of the causes of her unhappiness was deep sexual desire and frustration: "I long for things I ought not to prize. I find it impossible to love where I ought, or to keep from loving where I ought not. My mind is a chaos, a confused mingling of good and evil. I weary of my very self, yet cannot die." She was "excitable and depressive, ambitious and anxious." She was "disturbed by her sexual appetites," which "had hastened her into two bad marriages and was now snaring her in longing for Edward Lane."
Lane was several years her junior, happily married with young children. He had trained as a lawyer before switching to medicine and now ran a health clinic called Moor Park, in which he practiced hydropathy, "a popular treatment for the vague, anxiety-related sicknesses" of the Victorian Age, a treatment based in the belief "that immersion in hot and cold baths and showers could restore health to an unbalanced body." One of his patients was Charles Darwin, who was "overwhelmed by anxiety about his 'everlasting species-Book,' the work that would become 'On the Origin of Species.'" Another was Isabella Robinson, who desperately wanted to be not merely his patient but his lover, notwithstanding her apparently genuine friendship with his wife and her fondness for their sons, with whom her own sons often played.
If the diary is to be believed, she pursued him decorously but insistently. At times he was warm, at others he was cold. Then, one Sunday in October 1854, the two walked together in the woods before coming to what she called "a glade of surpassing beauty." There "something extraordinary happened: the fantasies that Isabella had nurtured in her diary crossed into life." Lane kissed her, sending her into raptures: "What followed I hardly remember - passionate kisses, whispered words, confessions of the past. Oh, God! I had never hoped to see this hour, or to have my part of love returned. But so it was. He was nervous, and confused, and eager as myself."
Soon thereafter they were back in the countryside, where "I rested among the dry fern. I shall not state what followed." Indeed she never was more explicit than that, though Summerscale suggests that there was "an incompleteness in her physical union with the doctor: something short of orgasm, perhaps, or consummation." Whatever the unknown truth, one day in May 1856, while on a family holiday in France, Henry Robinson found his wife's diary and read it. He kept it and, upon his return to England, found in her desk "further diaries and other papers: essays, letters, notes and poems. He took them all." In 1857, he filed and was granted "a divorce (BEGIN ITAL)a mensa et thoro - a divorce from bed and board, or a judicial separation," and the next year he filed for a full divorce under England's recently liberalized laws.
To obtain it he had to go to court, in a public hearing in which the most damning excerpts from Isabella's diary were read and subsequently published in the press. In a letter to an older man who had befriended and counseled her, she wrote: "That men, mere strangers, no ways authorised, should have considered themselves at liberty to pry into, to peruse, to censure, to select from, my private writings, with curious, unchivalrous, ignoble hands, I cannot understand. I could no more have done so than I could have listened meanly to their prayers, their midnight whisperings, or their accents of delirium; I should have considered myself insulted by [the] bare proposition to read papers not meant for my eyes but the writer's."
She won a small victory: the divorce was not granted, but the court refused her request to make her husband pay her legal costs. She was "left impoverished, disgraced and friendless, with the same confused desires that had propelled her into this mess: her impulse to write, her hunger for sex, her yearning for companionship, her intellectual curiosity, her wish to be with her sons." Hers is a sad story, but Summerscale tells it with sympathy and understanding. She sees Isabella as a British Emma Bovary, whose story Gustave Flaubert was setting down in his great novel even as Isabella's story was unfolding. She also sees Isabella as a transitional figure in women's slow and difficult progress from repression and exploitation to the liberation that in time emerged. The evidence Summerscale presents suggests that this is a fair interpretation.
Jonathan Yardley can be reached at yardleyj@washpost.com.
Copyright 2012 Washington Post Writers GroupKeywords:
Family Film Reviews Family Film Reviews for 6/15/2012 read more | archives
Lynda Hirsh Lynda Hirsch On Soaps read more | archives
Kids' Home Library Make Your Summer Sound Happy With These New Kids' CDs read more | archives See More Related News Review: With 'Cars Land,' Disney's ... 'Glass House' reality show wins court ... Dave on Demand: The television week in ... Lohan examined by paramedics after long... Movie theaters are reluctant to rework ... What's opening in theaters next week N.Y.'s subway performers audition ... Music gets only more interesting and ... See More Related Books from BookDailyCategory/Genre:
The Reverend's Wife
When Crickets Cry
The Finkler Question (Man Booker Prize)
©2012 ArcaMax Publishing. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Advertising window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId: '181830548533623', status: true, cookie: true, oauth: true, xfbml: true }); }; // Load the SDK Asynchronously (function(d){ var js, id = 'facebook-jssdk'; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement('script'); js.id = id; js.async = true; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js"; d.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(js); }(document));
Washington Post book reviewersJames Morton
Overlook
ISBN 978-1590206386
266 pages
$27.95
Reviewed by Michael Dirda, who reviews books for The Washington Post every Thursday. Visit his book discussion at washingtonpost.com/readingroom/.
I first heard of Vidocq when, in college, I read several of Balzac's novels. In "Pere Goriot," the book's provincial young hero, at sea in 19th-century Paris, is befriended by a daring criminal mastermind named Vautrin. In "Lost Illusions" and "The Splendors and Miseries of Courtesans," a worldly prelate turns out to be Vautrin in disguise. Ultimately, Balzac tells us, this elusive Napoleon of crime shifts allegiances and, when last glimpsed, has risen to become head of the Paris secret police. Vautrin, I learned from my teacher, was based on the amazing Eugene-Francois Vidocq (1775-1857).
As James Morton reminds the reader in his introduction to "The First Detective," Vidocq led the kind of devil-may-care life that most men simply daydream about. When little more than a boy, he ran away from home, lost all the money he had stolen (from his father's shop) in a drunken debauch at a brothel, then landed a job with a circus. Exceptionally strong, apparently irresistible to women and an excellent swordsman (as well as a master of the French foot-fighting technique called savate), Vidocq passed the first half of his adult life as a soldier, thief, smuggler, gambler and convict. No prison could hold him, as he escaped from one after the other, often through the use of ingenious disguises.
Eventually, Vidocq switched sides. Faced with a long sentence on a chain gang, this natural-born, if somewhat unscrupulous, survivor cut a deal. Why not, he asked, set a thief to catch a thief -- or rather many thieves? In 1809, while still locked up in La Force prison, Vidocq quietly began to pass along information and cellblock gossip to the authorities. In 1811, given his freedom, he started a new career with the Paris police, at first snitching on his former companions in larceny, then tracking down the culprits behind various robberies and killings, and sometimes acting as an agent provocateur. Within a year, he had founded the undercover division of the police -- the Surete -- and had become its first chief.
As such, Vidocq regularly hired ex-cons and prostitutes as his agents, attempted to prevent crimes and not just solve them, and -- no surprise here -- somehow managed to enrich himself. Under his command, the Surete captured thousands of criminals (about 1,500 a year). In 1827, though, Vidocq fell from favor, being accused of graft and blamed for the recidivism of some of the rough men and women he employed. Almost immediately, he did what all public officials do when they leave office: He published his memoirs. In 1828, the four volumes of his life and adventures became an international best-seller. One modern translator has said that they contain nothing less than "the best criminal stories in the world."
Yet Vidocq's career was far from over. During the last 25 years of his life, he poured money into a paper mill, which failed; started the first private detective agency (the Bureau des Renseignements -- that is, the Office of Information); repeatedly got into trouble with his staid successors at the Surete; traveled to London with a kind of "Chamber of Horrors" show, which displayed instruments of torture as well as the manacles and weighted boots he had worn as a prisoner; and dined out regularly with the high and the mighty. What host or hostess could resist the postprandial stories of this charismatic rogue?
Those stories, of course, sometimes smacked of fiction -- could anyone have packed quite this much experience into one life? -- and to this day there are questions about the authenticity of at least some of the anecdotes in the "Memoirs." Still, it's little wonder that Vidocq directly inspired Balzac's mastermind Vautrin and to some degree all the great fictional criminals and detective heroes of the later 19th century, including Dickens' Magwitch (from "Great Expectations") and Poe's Dupin (who mentions him by name in "The Murders in the Rue Morgue"). In Victor Hugo's "Les Miserables" the two main characters -- convict-escapee Jean Valjean and his relentless pursuer, Inspector Javert -- are modeled, respectively, after the young and middle-aged Vidocq.
More recently, this almost-mythic figure has appeared in "Vidocq" -- a movie given a fantastic, graphic-novel treatment similar to that of Robert Downey Jr.'s Sherlock Holmes -- and in Louis Bayard's superb historical thriller "The Black Tower." What we need now is a new edition of Edwin Gile Rich's 1935 English abridgement of the memoirs, or better yet, a wholly new translation.
In the meantime, lacking anything better, James Morton's biography provides a fast-moving introduction to "the Terror of Thieves." While Morton often just summarizes episodes from the memoirs, he does carry his biography into Vidocq's later years. What troubles me about the book, however, is its jaggedy, haphazardly digressive style and an air of casualness verging on the sloppy and vulgar. At one point Vidocq is described as "a few swallows short of a liter bottle." A woman is called "one of the most high-spirited if not reckless fillies of her time." Throughout, Morton seems to leave out transitional sentences or abruptly refer back to elements he hasn't actually mentioned. At other moments, he suddenly brings in facts, sometimes striking ones, that nonetheless verge on the non sequitur: Discussing a former English prostitute suspected of murder, he concludes: "She died in 1840. It was the year that in Brussels photography was first used for police purposes." He even botches Oscar Wilde's famous quip by claiming that "no sensible man can help laughing at the death of Little Dorrit." He means Little Nell (Little Dorrit doesn't die). He somehow mistakenly names Rastignac, instead of Lucien de Rubempre, as the object of Vautrin's attentions in "The Splendors and Miseries of Courtesans." Above all, "The First Detective" lacks clarity of design, even as the plethora of names makes it difficult to keep track of which criminals are which.
Nonetheless, Vidocq's life is so exciting that one tends to partially excuse these lapses. Here is an account of the notorious robbery of the Lyons Mail and a history of the Sanson family of executioners. Here are walk-on roles for the gourmet Anthelme Brillat-Savarin, revered for his monumental "Physiology of Taste"; the poet Lamartine; the notorious murderer Pierre-Francois Lacenaire, who claimed to have been inspired to a life of crime by reading Vidocq's memoirs; and even Jean Gaspard Deburau, the mime-hero of Marcel Carne's great film "Les Enfants du Paradis."
Vidocq knew them all. His was truly an astonishing life and one that awaits a biography to match it.
Copyright 2011 Washington Post Writers GroupKeywords:
You are not logged in: Login | Register