Google Search

Monday, April 4, 2011

"True You" and "Reading Obama"

ArcaMax Publishing, Inc.
Wine and Dine Video
Jambalaya Sandwich Recipe
Play Now!


Alert. Email is incomplete due to blocked images. Add to safe sender list now.
Washington Post Book Reviews
For You
Monday April 4, 2011
    TRUE YOU: A Journey to Finding and Loving Yourself
    Janet Jackson, with David Ritz
    Gallery
    ISBN 978-1416587248
    259 pages
    $25.99

    Reviewed by Michael Gross
    Janet Jackson's "True You" boasts alluring packaging: It's printed on the kind of ultra-white paper you rarely see in books anymore, chock-full of photos and beautifully designed. Fans of pop-star nonfiction will inevitably be drawn to it. But despite its sheen, it's no revealing "Life" (Keith Richards) or "Chronicles" (Bob Dylan). Instead, it's a mash-up of celebrity tell-nothing, dysfunction memoir and Oprah-ready self-help.
    Its biggest revelations? Jackson loves rainy days, hopes she's finally conquered a long-standing body-image issue and calls her late brother -- who had body-image issues of his own, although they go unmentioned -- "Mike." Clearly, the publisher of "True You" assumes that a slight book by a sometimes not-so-slight superstar will still sell to Jackson fans, and although that's cynical, it's also true. Despite its lack of narrative heft, it's bulked up with reprinted fan letters, sob stories from Jackson friends, a 14-page memo from her nutritionist and 70 pages of recipes. My advice: If you want to know who she really is, cue up Jackson's "Control" or "Rhythm Nation" instead.
    Here's the gist of her message, repeated like a disco beat: Despite wealth and fame, she was always miserable. Even as the world thought she was beautiful and talented, she thought she was a fat disappointment, and her loving family, although they instilled the fearsome Jackson work ethic in her -- and she loves them for it -- never addressed or even acknowledged her issues. "Because ours was a show business family, we were pretty much on our own," she writes in a devastating off-hand admission. "Other than the extremely rare holiday dinner, we didn't have regular sit-down meals." So she became "the kind of kid who ate anything and everything. ... Food was everything warm and wonderful."
    Food was, in fact, a facsimile of family. "My parents were overwhelmed with responsibilities." Yet, in her telling, they were quite irresponsible. "My siblings and I grew up with the belief that you don't let people know what's going on inside. ... Fans paid hard-earned money to watch us perform, and our job was to make them happy. End of story." Until she realized, all on her own, that it was only the beginning.
    Janet's long-sought solution? Look in the mirror, like Al Franken's Stuart Smalley, and repeat, "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!" When my attention flagged during the sort of anecdotes politicians use to connect with the masses, the thought of Smalley's faux earnestness kept me reading. Unfortunately, she is serious.
    To be fair, she sends a clear signal on the second page: "This is not an autobiography. It's a journey that I am still taking to love and to accept myself just as I am." Alas, almost from the start of her career -- on the sitcom "Good Times" -- outside forces conspired to make the then-10-year-old hate herself. "I was told," she writes, "I needed to bind my breasts. ... For a girl so young, this was confusing (but) there was no room for personal confusion."
    "Please believe me: my struggles are real," she continues on page four. "Depression leads to overeating." Luckily, by page seven, she subtly foreshadows a happy ending. "In 2008, I lost ... sixty pounds, but gained something far more valuable: a love and appreciation for myself that I will never lose." Bless you, Dr. Smalley.
    What Jackson most wants us to know is that really, she's just like us. As a child, she compared herself unfavorably with her sister and was teased by that Mike guy, who gave her ample posterior -- often referred to as her booty -- "pet names." Not Bubbles, I hope.
    But I'm being churlish. Three decades ago, a giant marketing firm studying book-buying in the United States concluded that the more people read, the more they will read. In other words, if a book, no matter how empty of calories, draws people in, they might buy another and another, and maybe try one with some nutritional value. So please, Janet Jackson fans, ignore all the above. I heartily recommend "True You." Buy it. And more books like it. And maybe some that are unlike it, too.
    Michael Gross is the author of "Model," "740 Park," "Rogues' Gallery" and the forthcoming "Unreal Estate."

    Copyright 2011 Washington Post Writers Group

    Comment on this Story | Printer Friendly | Share | Top
    READING OBAMA: Dreams, Hope, and the American Political Tradition
    READING OBAMA: Dreams, Hope, and the American Political TraditionJames T. Kloppenberg
    Princeton Univ
    ISBN 978-0691147468
    302 pages
    $24.95

    DECONSTRUCTING OBAMA: The Life, Loves, and Letters of America's First Postmodern President  Jack Cashill
    Threshold
    ISBN 978-1451611113
    343 pages
    $25

    Reviewed by Craig Fehrmanis
    Politicians have long exploited the symbolic power of books. In "Six Crises" (1962), Richard Nixon wrote of a conversation with newly elected President John F. Kennedy. "Every public man should write a book," Kennedy told Nixon, "because it tends to elevate him in popular esteem to the respected status of an 'intellectual.'" There are other reasons for politicians to write books -- profit and public exposure. But the accolades from a tale well-told can burnish an image, as Kennedy found with "Profiles in Courage" (1955), and Barack Obama discovered with "Dreams from My Father" (1995) and "The Audacity of Hope" (2006).
    The influence of books lies at the heart of two new ones about President Obama. They take very different approaches and reach very different conclusions about the president, his intellect and his politics. In "Reading Obama," James Kloppenberg, a professor of intellectual history at Harvard, studies not only Obama's own writings but also the writers who shaped his thinking. Kloppenberg interviewed Obama's professors, examined articles he edited while president of the Harvard Law Review and analyzed his two books.
    The president's books provide the hook and organizing principle for "Reading Obama." Kloppenberg is attracted to the political and historical aspects of "The Audacity of Hope," and that book plays a larger role in his analysis than "Dreams From My Father." He writes that "Audacity" is "often dismissed, incorrectly, as a typical piece of campaign fluff." But in Kloppenberg's eyes, the book reveals Obama to be a philosopher-president, someone whose peers include Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln and Wilson. His reading of Obama convinces him that the president fuses "three distinct developments": the American democratic tradition, the philosophy of pragmatism, and the academic debates that defined campuses during his educational years. Each contributed to the president's desire for compromise and consensus.
    Kloppenberg's method does not always provide original insight into Obama's ideas, but it does reveal the careful, career-long thought behind them. For instance, Obama's commitment to pragmatism -- what Kloppenberg calls "philosophical pragmatism" as opposed to Bill Clinton's "vulgar pragmatism" -- requires him to admit that, sometimes, it doesn't offer the best solution. "It has not always been the pragmatist," Obama writes in "Audacity," who "has created the conditions for liberty." In a 2006 story for Time, Joe Klein counted more than 50 of these "on the one hand ... on the other hand" formulations in Obama's book. Klein saw them as a sign of the then-senator's political savvy. But "Reading Obama" suggests they were something else: the result of a sincere and coherent worldview.
    Kloppenberg works through many influences on Obama, from James Madison to Gordon Wood's scholarship on Madison, in a style that is clear, methodical and dry. (One exception comes in his wonderfully barbed asides about the Washington media.) But "Reading Obama" also delivers terrific capsule histories of the movements and individuals who had an impact on the president -- the turmoil in legal studies in the 1980s, figures ranging from John Rawls to Clifford Geertz. This is not a beach read, but it will teach you much about Obama.
    In contrast to Kloppenberg, Jack Cashill takes a withering view of Obama as an author. He complains that the president's books contribute to "the foundational myth of Obama as genius." In "Deconstructing Obama," he presents his thesis that Obama did not write his books and that he turned to "unrepentant terrorist" Bill Ayers for assistance.
    Cashill, an author and blogger who has a doctorate in American Studies, argues that Obama was "desperate" in 1994 for help in finishing his overdue first book, "Dreams From My Father," and turned to Ayers. Recognizing Obama as a politically sympathetic up-and-comer, Ayers agreed to write or rewrite parts and to edit others. Like all politicians, Obama got plenty of help with his speeches and, when it came time for his second book, "Audacity," he encouraged his staff to ape Ayers -- and even brought back the man himself to ghostwrite the book's prologue and much of its epilogue.
    To support this theory, Cashill relies on various types of evidence: chronological (Obama's schedule didn't allow enough time to write either book); biographical (Christopher Andersen's "Barack and Michelle" has two unnamed sources who say Ayers helped Obama); statistical (computer-generated comparisons of Obama's prose with that of Ayers and other writers); and, most of all, stylistic (Obama and Ayers both rely on "the language of the sea," though only Ayers comes from a nautical background).
    While Cashill strives for a scholarly tone, he packages "Deconstructing Obama" as a memoir-detective story, moving from his initial discovery of Ayers' role in 2008 to his sleuthing out purported facts about the literary relationship between the two men.
    Cashill's clues are far from convincing. Cashill believes that the similarity between the two men's "imagery" and "structure" is by itself "almost enough to convict" Obama of his charges. For example, Ayers writes in his memoir, "Fugitive Days:" "The confrontation in the Fishbowl flowed like a swollen river into the teach-in, carrying me along the cascading waters from room to room, hall to hall, bouncing off boulders." In "Dreams," Obama writes the following passage: "I heard all our voices begin to run together, the sound of three generations tumbling over each other like the currents of a slow-moving stream, my questions like rocks roiling the water, the breaks in memory separating the currents."
    "Deconstructing Obama" includes many more flimsy examples of stylistic overlap: Obama and Ayers both misquote a line from Carl Sandburg's famous poem "Chicago"; they both misspell the name of a city in South Africa (though they misspell it in different ways); they both love the words "flutter" and "ragged." Cashill bends or invents evidence to fit his theories and further undercuts his argument with errors of fact and interpretation.
    He attacks the media for ignoring Andersen's book, to which Cashill says Obama gave his "tacit blessing." But the White House, in fact, so disliked the book that it canceled a staffer's CNN appearance because the network booked Andersen -- and then quizzed him about the Ayers connection.
    "Deconstructing Obama" is distressing also for what it reveals about the publishing industry. Cashill details how the media, including conservative outlets such as Fox News and the National Review, ignored his research. Yet he has now published a book with the conservative imprint of Simon & Schuster, one of the biggest houses in the country.
    Books may be our most sophisticated and important medium -- Kloppenberg's volume offers proof of that -- but Cashill's work should remind us that books also are not nearly as accountable as they ought to be. Anything that sells is fit to print, even if it is as grotesque, delusional and paranoid as "Deconstructing Obama." You can't trust a book by its cover. That's a point Cashill set out to make -- and did so, thoroughly, though not in the way he intended.
    Craig Fehrmanis working on a book about presidents and their books.

    Copyright 2011 Washington Post Writers Group

    Comment on this Story | Printer Friendly | Share | Top



    Advertisement
    Stimulus Grant Approval.com - Billions in Aid Available

    Did you know our government gives away billions of dollars to
    people just like you? These grants have application deadlines
    and many are coming up.

    Don't miss your chance to get some of this money. Government
    grants were created to help citizens that are in need of
    government assistance.

    Now is the time to act. Don't let this money go unclaimed.
    Government resources are available for your benefit. If you
    are eligible, this grant money can help you cover all of your
    living costs, college tuition, or even your medical expenses!

    Find Money Now!
    Recent Stories
    Small Arrow   MY FATHER'S FORTUNE
    Small Arrow   THE FEAR: Robert Mugabe and the Martyrdom of Zimbabwe
    Small Arrow   THE SOCIAL ANIMAL: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement
    Small Arrow   DAY OF HONEY: A Memoir of Food, Love, and War
    Small Arrow   ROCK BOTTOM



    Shop, Dine Out, and Earn Up to $28/hr doing it!  Click here for more info...
    Quick Clicks
    Discover the Secrets to America's Most Wanted Recipes
    Dog Lovers! Get Crazy Critters - The plush toy with no stuffing that no dog can resist.
    BareLifts - Lifts & Firms! The Invisible Solution For A Naturally Perky Look

    Copyright © 2009 ArcaMax Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.